HbA1c in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: between global standardization and the need for local adaptation

Authors

  • Claudio Daniel González CEMIC University Institute, Austral University, Buenos Aires City, Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47196/diab.v60i2.1356

Keywords:

HbA1c, diagnosis, diabetes mellitus, global standardization, local adaptation

Abstract

The incorporation of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) as a diagnostic criterion for diabetes mellitus (DM) has represented one of the most significant conceptual advances of recent decades. Its adoption, backed by international consensus, addressed the need for a stable, reproducible, and clinically significant marker. HbA1c values ​​play a role of great clinical importance not only in the diagnosis of the disease but also in its monitoring. However, as noted by Forte et al. 1 , this apparent robustness faces challenges when applied to real-world, heterogeneous contexts such as those found in Latin America.

Author Biography

Claudio Daniel González, CEMIC University Institute, Austral University, Buenos Aires City, Argentina

Professor of Pharmacology, Director of the Master's Program in Diabetes

References

I. Forte MN, Costa LD, Elgart JF, Flores LE. Utilidad diagnóstica de la determinación de hemoglobina glicosilada (HbA1c) en prediabetes y diabetes mellitus tipo 2: una revisión crítica de la evidencia y su aplicabilidad en contextos reales. Rev Soc Arg Diab; 2026(60)1.

II. Nathan DM, Genuth S, Lachin J, Cleary P, Crofford O, Davis M, et al. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:977-86.

III. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment. Lancet. 1998;352:837-53.

IV. American Diabetes Association. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(Suppl 1):S15-S33.

V. Davidson MB, Schriger DL. Effect of age and race/ethnicity on HbA1c levels. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010;87:415-21.

VI. Gagliardino JJ, Elgart JF, Bourgeois M, et al. Diabetes primary prevention program: new insights. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2018;34:e2943.

VII. Bennett CM, Guo M, Dharmage SC. HbA1c as a screening tool for detection of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabet Med. 2007;24:333-43.

VIII. Battelino T, Danne T, Bergenstal RM, et al. Clinical targets for continuous glucose monitoring data interpretation: recommendations from the international consensus on time in range. Diabetes Care. 2019;42:1593-603.

Published

2026-07-29

Issue

Section

Editorial