P41 Diagnosis in gestational diabetes during the pandemic

Authors

  • Ana María Tetta Mirabal Private office, Tucumán, Argentina
  • Olga Ester Graiff Private office, Tucumán, Argentina
  • Marina Sarmiento Mayo Clinic, Tucumán, Argentina
  • Adriana del C. Elías Institute of Maternity and Gynecology Nuestra Señora de las Mercedes, Tucumán, Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47196/diab.v54i3Sup.714

Keywords:

diagnosis, gestational diabetes, pandemic

Abstract

Objectives: Analyzing the effect of the pandemic over perinatal controls and results of diabetic pregnant women.

Materials and Methods: Exploratory, transversal, descriptive, and comparative study. Sample: 465 registers of diabetic pregnant women treated by the EIPED team (Multidisciplinary Team for the study of the diabetic pregnant woman) from the Our Lady of Mercy Maternity and Gynecology Institute during the first semester of the year 2019 (n=237) and 2020 (n=228). Variables: Aggregator variable: Year (1st semester of 2019; 1st semester of 2020); Maternal age, maternal BMI, Risk Factors (RF); Gestation Age 1st Consultation (Trimester: T1, T2, T3, Postpartum); Mode of delivery; Derivation Delay (% weeks): (D0: no delay; D1:<4w; D2:4-13w; D3:14-26w; D4:Postpartum); Newborn Condition: FD; Alive; Dead; Weight/GA: IUGR (P97); APGAR 1 minute. Statistical Study: Descriptive, Associations Analysis (Chi-Squared Test) to the 5%.

Results: Maternal Age: 30±6; Min=17; Max=44. BMI: 2% (Low); 29% (Normal Weight); 20% (Overweight); 49% (Obesity), without year association (p=0.9955). Risk Factors (RF): 31% with two RF and 42% with three or more RF. GA 1st consultation (p=0.0061): 2019: T1 (2%), T2 (23%), T3 (70%), Postpartum (6%); 2020: T1 (1%), T2 (21%), T3 (62%), Postpartum (15%). A total of 319 (71%) patients completed the pregnancy, a 70%
with cesarean delivery: there was no difference between years (p=0.5243). Derivation Delay (D %) 2019/2020: D0 (3/5); D1 (40/26); D2 (48/50); D3 (4/3); D4 (6/17) with p=0.000626; New Born (NB): 99.4% alive; in 2020: 2 FD and 2 deceased before the 24 hours. Weight/GA: LW (9%); Adequate Weight (79%); High Weight (12%) without year
association p=0.2633. APGAR 1 minute: 88% (≥8); 11% (6 to 7) without year association p=0.2756.

Discussion and Conclusion: Comparing the first semester of 2019 and 2020, no association in the perinatal result was observed. However, IUGR (P<3) were a 38% higher than in 2019, with 4 adverse results: 2 FD and 2 deceased NW before the 24 hours. The first late consultation was a 61% higher than in 2019, and it was observed, in 2020, a delay in a 70% higher than 4 weeks, especially on postpartum (from a 6%, it increased to a 17%). The diagnosis of the diabetic pregnant women, in times of pandemic, has been hampered by various factors regarding primary care, laboratory diagnosis and the timely referral to the team, a situation that generates consequences in the short and long term for the mother/child binomial. It must be highlighted that once these factors are detected, strategies and regulations must be established in order to reduce them to the maximum and detect them on time, ensuring a better result.

Published

2020-11-21

How to Cite

Tetta Mirabal, A. M., Graiff, O. E., Sarmiento, M., & Elías, A. del C. (2020). P41 Diagnosis in gestational diabetes during the pandemic. Journal of the Argentine Society of Diabetes, 54(3Sup), 146–146. https://doi.org/10.47196/diab.v54i3Sup.714

Issue

Section

Selected articles. Poster presentations

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.