Symposium: New horizons in the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus. New insulins. Smart insulin

Authors

  • Guillermo Dieuzeide Hospital Nuestra Sra del Carmen Chacabuco, Province of Buenos Aires, Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47196/diab.v55i3Sup.508

Keywords:

insulins, history, treatments

Abstract

In 1921, Dr. Banting's impressive intuition led to discovery and subsequent crystallization of insulin in Toronto University. Its administration to the patient Leonard Thompson marked a historic milestone in humanity and immediately determined a scientific success which translated into therapeutic benefits for millions of patients diagnosed with diabetes.

However, transformation of this molecule into a safe drug that would solve the need for an adequate physiological replacement for endogenous insulin is still a long ongoing process.

In 1936, Hagerdon and Jensen discovered that adding protamine, a protein obtained from river trout semen, could extend insulin median lifespan. In 1946, an intermediate acting insulin (NPH), which includes insulin and protamine crystals, was developed at Novo Nordisk Lab. In 1959, due to a high level of allergic reactions to bovine derived insulin, Yalow and Salomon thought "humanized" insulin should be used. Moreover, there was an issue with the amount of bovine and porcine pancreas supply as raw material not being enough. Towards 1973, early "monocomponent" purified animal insulins were manufactured.

In 1980, a big leap forward was given by Genentech company, after Goeddel’s and Riggs' publication, while obtaining human insulin protein via recombinant DNA in Escherichia Coli culture technology. In 1982, the first insulin human obtained from recombinant DNA at a big scale was produced by Lilly Lab. Subsequently, Novo Nordisk achieved the same result by using Saccharomyces Cerevisiae cultures. (1-2)

In 1996, faster acting analog insulin with a L-lysine and L-proline switched position in its B chain was developed by Lilly. Also, fast-acting insulin with L-proline replaced by aspart at position B 28 was developed by Novo Nordisk. Later, Sanofi Lab obtained a fast analog with a switched position of amino-acids at position B 3 of L-asparagine for lysine and lysine at position B 29 for glutamine.

As regards long-acting analog insulins, Sanofi Lab achieved a long-acting analog by replacing asparaginase for glycine on the α chain and adding arginine residues on the β chain. L-arginine changes the isoelectric point of a molecule, going from a 5,4 pH to 6,7, making it more soluble at acid pH and less at physiological ph. In 2005, a long-acting analog was developed by Novo Nordisk, which is called insulin Detemir. It was created by adding a 14-carbon fatty acid (myristic acid) at position B 29 and suppressing L-threonine at position 30.  This determines insulin bonding to albumin in a reversible manner1-2.

By the end of this decade, long-acting insulin analogs of a second generation finally appeared, such as insulin Degludec, in which threonine at position B 30 was removed and a 16-carbon fatty acid was added to lysine at position B 29 via a spacer glutamic acid, which allowed a prolonged action up to almost 42 h3. Subsequently, Sanofi developed concentrated insulin Toujeo in 300 U, which facilitated its diffusion process at a lower injection volume. Last year, concentrated insulin Degludec in 200 U was manufactured4.

Since 2017, new ultra-rapid-acting insulin alternative trials started to be available: insulin Fiasp5,6,7 and ultra-rapid-acting insulin lispro8. In the first case, niacinamide was added to the insulin molecule, modifying absorption rate and also arginine was added, acting like a molecule stabilizer. By performing these modifications, more exposure to insulin in the area under the curve in the first 30 minutes, as compared to faster insulin aspart, was achieved twice. A similar situation occurred with ultra-rapid-acting insulin lispro (insulin lispro –aabc), using Treprostinil (a vasodilator) and citrate, which increases vascular permeability accelerating the apparition of insulin in blood by 8 minutes. In patients diagnosed with T1D, ultra-rapid-acting insulin lispro reduces postprandial glycemic excursion by 30-40% compared to insulin lispro.

However, one of the most promising changes lately was obtaining long-duration insulins that can be used weekly. One of the companies involved was Lilly by using insulin joined to an immunoglobulin Fc fragment (IgF2 FC). Other studies involved insulin PEGylated and finally, insulin icodec was developed by Novo Nordisk. It featured a threonine terminal remotion at position 29 in chain B and replacement of 3 amino acids (A14E,B16H,yB25H), joined via a spacer or hydrophilic linker to a 20-carbon fatty diacid. After injection, insulin hexamers dissociate in monomers and join albumin to create an inactive deposit strongly tied, reducing enzymatic degradation and mitigating a bond to receptor and insulin clearance. Afterwards, the molecule begins to slowly release monomers and after 3 to 4 weekly injections, equilibrium is achieved by a frequent release of insulin icodec of albumin.

Author Biography

Guillermo Dieuzeide, Hospital Nuestra Sra del Carmen Chacabuco, Province of Buenos Aires, Argentina

Endocrinology Specialist; Head of the Endocrinology and Diabetes Service

References

I. Luis DA, Romero E. Análogos de insulina modificaciones en la estructura, consecuencias moleculares y metabólicas. Revista de Medicina Familiar Semergen 2010; Vol 36,8.

II. Insulin at its 100 Birthay Historical Overview. Conferencia dictada por el profesor David Harlan en la 81th Scientific Session of the American Diabetes Association. 2021

III. Haar H, Fita EG, Heise T. A review of insulin degludec/insulin aspart pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties and their implications in clinical use. Clin Pharmacokinet 2017; 56(4):339-354. DOI: 10.1007/s40262-016-0455-7.

IV. Gough SC, Bhargava A, Jain R, Mersebach H, Rasmussen S, Berghentstal R. Low volume insulin degludec 200 U/ml once daily improves glucemic control similarly to insulin glargine with a low risk of hypoglycemia in insulin naive patients with type 2 diabetes :a 26 week randomized,controled multinational treat to target trial. The low begin low volume trial. Diabetes Care 2013; 36:2536-2542.

V. Heise T, Stender-Petersen K, Hovelman U, Jacoben JB, Nosek L, Ziljstra E, Haar H. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of faster acting insulin aspart vs insulin aspart across a clinically relevant dose range in subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Clin Pharmacokinet 2017; 56(6):649-660.

VI. Kazda, et al. Diabetes 2017,66 (supl 1 ) A 247-8

VII. Ishimura et al. ADA 2020 236OR

VIII. Linnennberg H, Zhang Q, La Bell E, Dellva MA, Coutant D, Hovelman U, Plum Morshel L, Herbrand T, Leohr J. Pharmacokinetic and glucodinamyc of ultrarapid insulin lispro (URLI) vs insulin lispro in younger adults and elderly patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus a randomized controled clinical trial. Clin Pharmacokinet 2020; 59(12):1589-1599.

IX. Rosenstock J, et al. Once week insulin for type 2 diabetes without previous insulin treatment. The New England J of Med 2020; 383:2107-16.

X. Silver R, Asong M, Begtrup K, Heller S, Liu L, Rosentok J. Similar hypoglycemia duration with once weekly insulin icodec vs insulin glargine u-100 in insulin naive or insulin experienced patients with type T2D. Oral presentation Insulins Symposium 81th ADA meeting 2021.

XI. Heise T. The future of insulin therapy. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 2021; 75:10 8820

XII. Hallberg I, Lyby K, Wasserman K, Heise T, Zijlstra E, Plum Morschel L. Efficacy and safety of oral basal insulins vs subcutáneous insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes: a randomized doublé bind, phase 2 trial. Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology 2019; 7:179-88. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30372-3.

XIII. Jarosinski M, Dhayalan B, Rege N, Chatterjee D, Weiss M. Smart insulins delivery technologies and intrinsic glucose responsive insulin analogues. Diabetologia 2021; 64:1016-1029.

XIV. Development of glucose responsive smart insulin system. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 2017; 24:267-278

XV. Rege N, Phillips N, Weiss M. Insulin therapy: future perspectives Cernea S, Raz I American Journal of therapeutics 2019; 0:1-2.

XVI. Wang J, Wan Z, Yu J, Kahkoska A, Buse J, Gu Zhen. Glucose responsive insulins and delivery systems: innovation and traslation. Adv Mather 2020; 32(13).

XVII. Hoeg-Jensen T. Glucose responsive insulins. Molecular Metabolism 2021; 46:101107.

XVIII. Bakh N, Cortinas A, Weiss M, Langer R, Anderson D, Gu Z, Sanjoy D, Strano D. Glucose responsive insulins by molecular and physical designs. Nature Chemistry 2017; 9:93-944. DOI: 10.1038/NCHEM.2857.

XIX. Scapin G, Dandey V, Zhang Z, Prosise W, Hruza A, Kelly Th, Mayhood T, Strickland C, Potter C, Carraget B. Structure of the insulin receptor complex by a single particle CryoEm analysis. Nature 2018; 556 (7699):122-125.

XX. Bakh N, Cortinas A, Weiss M, Langer R, Anderson D, Gu Z, Sanjoy D, Strano D. Glucose responsive insulins by molecular and physical designs. Nature Chemistry 2017;9:93-944. DOI: 10.1038/NCHEM.2857

XXI. The future of insulins as therapy. Conferencia dictada por el profesor Michael Weiss en la 81th sesión de la American Diabetes Association 2021.

Published

2021-12-01

How to Cite

Dieuzeide, G. (2021). Symposium: New horizons in the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus. New insulins. Smart insulin. Journal of the Argentine Society of Diabetes, 55(3Sup), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.47196/diab.v55i3Sup.508

Issue

Section

Inaugural conference

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>