P47 Physical activity prescription: 16 years later

Authors

  • Azul Larribité Argentine Diabetes Society, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Lucas Sosa Argentine Diabetes Society, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Oscar Bravo Catholic University of La Plata, Bahía Blanca Campus, Province of Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Luciana Grilli Argentine Diabetes Society, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Flavia Aragón Argentine Diabetes Society, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Claudio Fabián Dituro Argentine Diabetes Society, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Viviana Cogo Argentine Diabetes Society, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Marco Tripodi Argentine Diabetes Society, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Gustavo Ceccatto Argentine Diabetes Society, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Ana Paula García Argentine Diabetes Society, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Patricia Bernassar Argentine Diabetes Society, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Alejandro Sánchez Argentine Diabetes Society, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Julio Szuster Physical Activity and Diabetes Committee of the Sad (2002), Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47196/diab.v54i3Sup.433

Keywords:

physical activity, prescription, 16 years later

Abstract

Introduction: Regular physical activity contributes to metabolic control, reduction of cardiovascular risk factors and influences the feeling of physical, mental, and social wellbeing. In 2002, members of the SAD Physical Activity Committee studied the frequency of physical activity prescription and its association with personal factors in doctors attending the XIII Argentine Diabetes Congress. Of the respondents, only 39.3% declared that they prescribed physical activity on a regular basis. 16 years later, professionals from the Atlantic Chapter of the SAD raised the need for a new survey to determine the current situation.

Objectives: 1) Describe the frequency that doctors attending the XXI Argentine Diabetes Congress prescribe physical activity 2) Compare the results with those obtained in 2002 3) Evaluate the physicians personal and attitude factors related with the prescription of physical activity.

Materials and methods: 281 doctors (77% women), attending the XXI Argentine Diabetes Congress (Mar del Plata, 2018) were surveyed about their prescription frequency, form (verbal or written), non-prescription causes and personal factors that could influence their attitude: age, risk factors and physical activity practice. Descriptive statistical comparisons were made between the two years of study by calculating proportions and graphical representations. A cross-sectional analysis of cases and controls was performed, calculating the odds ratio. For each odd ratio, the confidence interval (CI) was calculated with P <0.05. The statistical software InfoStat was used.

Results: In 2018, 100% of the professionals declared to prescribe physical activity versus 368 of 937 (39%, CI 36-42; P <0.05) of the respondents in 2002, showing a significant increase in the recommendation. In 2018, 194 of the 281 respondents (69%, CI 64-74; P <0.05) affirmed to do the indication in written form versus 101 of 368 in 2002 (27.4%, CI 22-32; P <0, 05). Of the 281 respondents, 88% reported physical activity practice. No association was observed between the lack of physical activity and the presence of cardiovascular risk factors. The correlation matrix showed a positive relationship between smoking and diabetes, as well as between hypertension, overweight and metabolic syndrome (P <0.05). Male and overweight doctors had a significantly higher risk of diabetes (OR 4.91 and 4.67 respectively; P <0.05). Hypertensive, overweight, and male physicians showed a significantly higher risk of metabolic syndrome (7.16, 6.84, and 2.51 respectively, P <0.05).

Conclusions: The systematic prescription of physical activity was declared by all the doctors surveyed in 2018, regardless of personal factors and physical activity practice. Most professionals (69%) declared that the indication was made in written form. In contrast, 16 years ago, prescription of physical activity was only declared by 39.3% of doctors and only 27.4% did so in written form. Taking these changes into account, we find an encouraging outlook. The practice of physical activity in the studied population had no impact on their health condition. The risk factors in the analyzed group were overweight and male sex for diabetes; and overweight, hypertension and male sex for metabolic syndrome.

Author Biographies

Lucas Sosa, Argentine Diabetes Society, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

Endocrinologist

Luciana Grilli, Argentine Diabetes Society, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

Medical specialist in Endocrinology

Claudio Fabián Dituro, Argentine Diabetes Society, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

Médico especialista en Medicina General e Integral, Magíster en Diabetes

Julio Szuster, Physical Activity and Diabetes Committee of the Sad (2002), Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

Nutrition specialist doctor

Published

2023-01-10

How to Cite

Larribité, A., Sosa, L., Bravo, O., Grilli, L., Aragón, F., Dituro, C. F., Cogo, V., Tripodi, M., Ceccatto, G., García, A. P., Bernassar, P., Sánchez, A., & Szuster, J. (2023). P47 Physical activity prescription: 16 years later. Journal of the Argentine Society of Diabetes, 54(3Sup), 152–152. https://doi.org/10.47196/diab.v54i3Sup.433

Issue

Section

Selected articles. Poster presentations

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2