When and in whom should the diagnosis be made?

Authors

  • Liliana Trifone Ricardo Gutiérrez Children's Hospital, City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

Keywords:

diabetes mellitus type 1, diagnosis

Abstract

In the last decade there have been important advances in the prevention and treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). On the current horizon there are new intervention modalities in pre-symptomatic stages, such as immunotherapies and others, which become a window of opportunity to stop the progression of the disease.

Understanding the natural history of DM facilitates the identification of susceptible individuals in the preclinical phase of DM1 and their risk. of clinical progression.

Two recent trials reported positive results of disease-modifying therapies suggesting an opportunity to delay T1D with teplizumab or preserve residual β cells with oral verapamil. The recent approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) The use of teplizumab for the treatment of early-stage DM1 meant a change in the paradigm from insulin replacement to disease modification.

In 95% of patients, anti-insulin autoantibodies, GAD (GAD65), tyrosine phosphatase (IA-2) and zinc transporter8 (ZnT8) are detected before the development of clinical DM1. More than 80% of individuals at risk for DM1 have signs of autoimmunity. The preclinical phases are considered part of the disease and are defined: a) stage 1, includes people with multiple autoantibodies and normoglycemia; b) stage 2, includes multiple autoantibodies and dysglycemia; c) stage 3 have overt clinical DM.

DM1 screening programs are a priority given the proven benefits of reducing diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) at the onset of stage 3 DM1 and the availability of therapies to delay disease progression.

That is why an Expert Consensus was developed (2024) on indications for monitoring autoantibodies in at-risk individuals: a) family members and people who are IAb+; b) people who are IAb+ are confirmed with a second sample; c) individuals with a single IAb+ have a lower risk of progression vs. with multiple IAb+; d) people with early stage DM1 should undergo regular medical check-ups, with regular assessment of glucose levels, education about the symptoms of DM and DKA, and psychosocial support; e) people with stage 2 should be offered participation in trials or approved therapies.

More research should be conducted on early-stage T1DM to promote, increase the rigor of future guidance and clinical care recommendations in pre-symptomatic stages.

Author Biography

Liliana Trifone, Ricardo Gutiérrez Children's Hospital, City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

Pediatrician, specialist in Nutrition and Childhood Diabetes, Head of Nutrition and Diabetes Section

References

I. Limbert C, von dem Berge T. Personalizing early-atage type 1 diabetes in children. Diabetes Care 2023;46.

II. Phillip M. Consensus guidance for monitoring individuals with islet autoantibody positive pre-stage type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2024;47(8):1-23.

III. Karpen SR, Dunne JL, Frohnert BI, et al.; Type 1 Diabetes Consortium. Consortium-based approach to receiving an EMA qualification opinion on the use of islet autoantibodies as enrichment biomarkers in type 1 diabetes clinical studies. Diabetologia 2023;66:415-424.

Published

2024-10-01

How to Cite

Trifone, L. (2024). When and in whom should the diagnosis be made?. Journal of the Argentine Society of Diabetes, 58(3Sup), 10–10. Retrieved from https://revistasad.com/index.php/diabetes/article/view/899

Issue

Section

Symposium Part 1

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)